The representation of teens in British
contemporary films
In this
research I will be looking into the way that teenagers are represented in
contemporary British films. British films produce a distorted representation of
British male teenagers, in particular those from lower class urban areas.
However, female teens with a middle class background are represented positively.
In my research I will be looking at various sources of information and analyzing
films that are represent a clear view on the topic. The films I will be looking
at are Kidulthood (2006), Harry Brown (2008), Angus, Thongs and perfect snogging (2008) and Bend It Like Beckham (2002). As well as this, I will also be taking
into consideration the social influences and impacts that have changed the film
industry and introduced the stereotypes that are shown throughout these films.
In British
contemporary cinema, lower class male British teens are represented to be
intimidating, aggressive and terrifying. This reflects some of the negative
representations I stated in my thesis. An example of this is identified in the
opening scene of Harry Brown, where
the director uses low key lighting and effective mise-en-scene to reflect ideas
that male teens are represented in stereotypical ways such as taking drugs,
being rebellious and being violent. A large group of male teens use peer
pressure and aggressiveness such as pushing and getting into his face to
intimidate another male into taking part in illegal activities. The use of low
key lighting in this scene straight away informs the audience that something
negative is happening, as well as showing that reflecting how the people in the
shot don’t want to be seen properly. However they do want to prove that they
have power and control and they show this through the way they act towards the
individual who clearly looks uncomfortable. This desire for power is a
reflection on the way society views male teens, and this view may have been affected
by social influences such as the London riots, where (by the majority) male
teens started a destructive riot over the death of criminal and gang member
Mark Duggan. The riots lasted for days as teens terrorized the streets of
London in an attempt to prove that they are a dominant force in society. The
riots had both an impact on the way teens were perceived by elders as they were
labeled with words such as ‘out of control’ and ‘a lost generation’ as well as
this, the way that teens reacted added to this as some felt they had become a
victim of a new prejudice, which unfortunately for some only led to worse
behavior. Kidulthood also reflects
ideas that male teens are threatening and contentious, particularly when
involved in groups rather than when alone. Similarly to Harry Brown, a group of older male teens wearing identity covering
clothing such as Hoodies surround a younger group of teens and bully them
physically and verbally, the verbal abuse seems to effect the younger group
more (than the physical bullying) which shows how important male teens place
their pride and ego. The characters in Harry
Brown and Kidutlhood are very
similar in many ways, for example they both show how male teens cluster in
groups when taking part in deviant or illegal activities, and they also are
shown to attack others who have no form of defense. This behavior confirms the
stereotype that male teens are intimidating and aggressive as they target
vulnerable, weaker people in order to show that they are the powerful force in
society. Gender roles are ‘cultural and personal’[1]
and they play a huge part in why male teenagers are perceived to and actually
do behave in the way in which these films represent them. This is mainly
because as infants males and females are treated differently by their elders.
An example of this differential treatment is the idea that’s young boys will be
expected to take part in aggressive activities such as play fighting and
playing competitive games such as football or rugby, on the contrary girls are
brought up to be caring and friendly, the complete opposite to a male. In an
article from The Guardian, they
suggest that teenage males ‘strike fear’[2]
into the people of Britian, and that films such as Kidulthood and Harry Brown
reflect the ideas that these characters are so fearsome, they will make
effective film antagonists. I believe that social influences are a reason for
the up rise in the ‘Lower class gangster male’ antagonist due to things such as
a rise in the awareness of teenage gangs, especially from areas that are deemed
lower class. The Guardian states that
people are ‘defined by their class’[3]
which backs up Karl Marx theory which suggest that ‘the history of all hitherto
existing society is the history of class struggles’[4]
which means that ‘ever since human society emerged from its primitive and
relatively undifferentiated state it has remained fundamentally divided between
classes who clash in the pursuit of class interests’[5].
The class differences are obvious to the audience watching films such as Bend It like Beckham and Angus, thongs and perfect snogging. In
comparison to these with the two other films, there are clear representation
differences. An example of a representation difference is how female teens are
shown to be affectionate and approachable, shown when Jesminder from Bend it like Beckham is approached by
Juliette while playing football. This type of stranger interaction would be
deemed as perilous if done in a situation where lower class male teens are
involved. This shows how male teens from lower class areas are reflected in a
negative way, whereas female teens from a middle class background are represented
in a positive light.
The theme of
negative stereotypes is also key to the distorted representation of lower class
teenage males in British contemporary cinema. An example of a stereotype from
British contemporary cinema is a scene from Kidulthood,
where three teenage males enter a designer clothes shop and are making a
bit of a nuisance while looking at expensive items. The security guard of the
shop immediately makes the prejudice that the boys are going to attempt to
steal from the shop. The guard made his prejudice due to the clothes that the
boys were wearing, items such as tracksuit bottoms which were pulled down,
hoodies covering their faces and ironically one boy was wearing a hat from the
same designer label. These items of clothing could be deemed as stereotypical
of lower class males. The guard made an assumption that the boys, due to there
costume, wouldn’t be able to afford the items in the shop due to the prejudice
they were from a lower class area where money income would be small. This
stereotype is part of the new theory, which suggests that male teens ‘have no
respect for any other part of society. It’s all about me, me, me.’[6]
Young males are a very commonly stereotyped group, and this is due to the fact
that ‘it is adults who create media texts and as a result of this younger
people… are given simplistic representations’[7].
I agree with this statement as the media is dominated by adults, giving teens
no chance to voice their thoughts and opinions on social matters and therefore
are constricted to having to take action in order to make a social statement. Harry Brown stereotypes ideas that male
teens are drug dealers, violent physically and also through the use of fatal
weapons such as guns. These
types on negative representations from Kidulthood
as well as Harry Brown also
affect the way that male British teens are seen in the British society. British
directors such as Daniel Barber (Harry
Brown) and Menhaj Huda (Kidutlhood) are
taking advantage of the fear of that the public have on the new gang culture
that is now ever growing in the UK.
The
Inbetweeners (2011) give a counter typical representation on teenage
males, they show the life of middle class white males who live in a suburban
area of England where they have very different aims in life compared to the
males seen in the lower class, for example Will (Inbetweeners) is desperate to gain a place in university and
therefore prioritizes his school work over his social life whereas in Kidulthood there is a complete disregard
for school life. The teenager’s represented in Kidulthood live in a completely different area to that of the males
in The Inbetweeners, they live in
council estates, flats based in extremely urbanized areas of London that are
considered dangerous places to be because of the fact that they tend to be crime
ridden areas. The idea that ‘the smart money in British cinema is going on
those films that prey on our fear of urban youths and show that fear back to
us’[8] suggests
that the media are exploiting teenage males as a character base for films. This
type of media based stereotype is a complete contrast to the stereotypes seen
in Angus, Thongs and perfect snogging.
An example of a stereotype shown is the idea of females battling over boys and
one of them not feeling attractive due to the lack of male attention. This stereotype is one that feminist in
particularly dislike as it shows males to be the more dominant sexuality as
they are shown to hold a clear power other the female. Although this is a
negative stereotype, it is a much less dangerous and damaging one compared to
that seen in Kiduthood and Harry Brown in terms of its effect on
society. Other less dangerous stereotypes are seen in Bend It Like Beckham where the one of the females in the film is
stereotyped by her own judgmental mother to be a lesbian because of the fact
that she plays football and shares a close friendship with another girl. This
is a common stereotype and there have been many recent campaigns in football
such as the ‘Rainbow lace’ campaign to help eradicate homophobia in football.
Professional female footballer Grace Stoney discusses the difficulty of being a
lesbian football, and explains how ‘I've
never hidden it within football circles because it is accepted, but to the
outside world, I've never spoken about my sexuality’[9],
this portrays why films such as Bend It
Like Beckham give us an insight into the difficulties of social stereotypes
on female football players. Stereotypes of young people are shown throughout
all the films I have looked at, some stereotypes could have more effect on
society than others, but I feel all of them have at least some effect on
society and the way that society views different genders and social groups. As
long as, especially male teens are represented the way they are, they will feel
under more pressure to actually conform to those stereotypes and it will
eventually become of vicious circle of stereotypes, media representation of the
stereotype and then the reaction to the stereotype.
Another aspect, which may be viewed in a negative way,
is the idiolect used by the youth in Kidulthood
and Harry Brown. The use of slang
by youths from particularly the lower class is quite a controversial subject.
People, particularly those who are from middle class and upper class
backgrounds may deem slang to be rude, disrespectful and a sign of someone
unintelligent; whereas people from lower class areas would argue it can give
people an identity and also give young people a type of freedom. Both films use
very similar terminology and also use it in similar contexts. Words such as
‘Fam’, ‘blad’, ‘bruv’ ‘ting’ and ‘buff’ are some examples of commonly used
slang terms throughout both films. Both films are London based films, and
therefore some of the slang used may not be used in Manchester for example,
however these areas still do have teens that use slang terms similarly to
London teens. The use of slang from these youth could be seen as a way to
express himself or herself as an individual and also could be seen as an
attempt to rebel against society by refusing to use the Queen’s English but
instead almost making their own modification on the language of English itself.
The use of slang could also be used as a way to be socially accepted in their
own society, where younger males may feel pressurized into using slang terms to
conform to expectations of elders. This is a change to the type of dialect used
in Bend It Like Beckham and Angus and Thongs and Perfect snogging where slang is non-existent, which
again reinforces my thesis that lower-class males are shown to be rebellious
and unintelligent whereas middle class teens are shown to be intelligent and
socially accepted. Similarly to other comparisons, the major difference between
the two groups being represented in the films is class differences, this is
another form of stereotype that middle class youths speak what is deemed
‘properly’ whereas the way that lower class youths speak is deemed as
‘improper’. The use of slang by young
male teens is another stereotype which is portrayed negatively by this
urbanized gang genre of films, the use of slang doesn’t always mean that the
person speaking it is a violent, dangerous and unintelligent person however the
films portray it in such a way that the audience wouldn’t know otherwise. The
use of slang is being misunderstood by the older generation due to the fact
that the media make it out to almost be dangerous.
The expectations that society have change massively
when it comes to the lower class and the middle class. Lower class males
particularly have a desire to rebel against the constraints that society places
upon them because they feel that society has been unfair to them, and that they
are actually owed a chance in life. Ethnicity could also be a factor in this
rebellious behavior, as unfortunately the majority of people living in lower
class areas are ethnic minorities, which could suggest that it is harder for
ethnic minorities to become successful and escape the lower class. Social
theorist Robert Merton uses the ‘self fulfilling profiecy’ theory which
suggests that ‘a false definition of the situation
evoking a new behavior which makes the originally false conception come true
to reflect ideas that people of a certain ethnicity are just going to fulfill
the stereotype placed upon them’[10]. This
lack of confidence in their ability to succeed the right way (getting a
education, good job etc.) leads to these males taking part in activities that they
think has a negative effect on society but in reality the only ones being given
a bad name are themselves. Females in Angus,
Thongs and perfect snogging and Bend
It Like Beckham however have the complete opposite reaction to social
expectations, they have a desire to fulfill them expectations and are
disappointed when they can’t achieve this, for example Georgia desires to have
a boyfriend, and this plays a part in her desire to get into a relationship
with ‘sex god’ Robbie. Jesminder faces a different type of social constraint to
that of Georgia, as she aspires to be a professional female footballer while
her parents would rather her concentrate on school and what they see as a
proper career such as becoming a doctor. This desire to achieve and become successful
in a morally right way represents middle class females as inspirational, hard
working and independent, which are all positive representations unseen in
teenage males from the lower class. Although in a way Jesminder does rebel as
she continues to play without her parents’ permission, but this is a very
different type of rebellious behavior compared to the characters in Kidulthood and Harry Brown. Altogether, social expectations and constraints play
an important part in all the films I have analyzed mainly due to the fact that
they lead the individuals to do the actions that they do.
In conclusion, I believe that teenage males are given a
false representation in contemporary British films; however they do target the
small percentage of teenage males that take part in negative activities, which
are portrayed in the films. Lower class male teens are shown as an intimidating
and aggressive group of people who are fearless to the consequences that could
potentially happen to them. They are also stereotyped to be disruptive,
unintelligent and violent which are all extremely negative stereotypes that
effect societies views on that particular social class. This all leads to the
social expectations placed upon teens from lower class areas as they are always
told that they will end up nowhere, following the trend set by other lower
class males who rebel against society and defy all rules. This is a stark
contrast to the positive representation of middle class teens where they are
represented as intelligent, obedient and will do anything to make sure they
meet the positive expectations society has of them.
Word Count: 2,828
Bibliography
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/nov/05/british-hoodie-films
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/prophecies.shtml
[2] http://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/nov/05/british-hoodie-films
[3] http://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/nov/05/british-hoodie-films
[4] http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/undergraduate/introsoc/marx6.html
[5] http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/undergraduate/introsoc/marx6.html
[6] http://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/nov/05/british-hoodie-films
[7] http://www.slideshare.net/smcmediastudies/harry-brown-age
[8] http://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/nov/05/british-hoodie-films
[9]http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/12/sportswomen-stereotyped-gay-coming-out-casey-stoney
[10] http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/prophecies.shtml
No comments:
Post a Comment